|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California 2019 Funding Assumption Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updated May 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed |
Base |
Assumed |
Amortization |
Valuation |
Asset |
|
RANK |
PLAN SPONSOR |
Investment |
Wage |
"Excess" |
Period |
Asset |
Smoothing |
|
2019 |
2018 |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
|
|
|
Return |
Inflation |
Investment |
(years) |
Corridor |
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
(b) |
(a) - (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
CalPERS - Legislative (closed) |
|
|
5.00% |
2.75% |
2.25% |
30- but FR > 100%; G/L 30 layered |
N/A (Market) |
N/A |
|
2 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
CalPERS - Judges System II 1, 3 |
|
|
6.50% |
2.75% |
3.75% |
2-declining ; G/L 30 layered and ramped |
N/A (market) |
N/A |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
11 |
15 |
City of San Diego 5 |
|
|
6.50% |
3.05% |
3.45% |
9-declining and part layered ;G/L layered 15. most level $$ |
Y: 80-120 |
4 |
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
San Mateo County |
|
|
6.75% |
3.00% |
3.75% |
5 - declining; G/L 15 layered |
Y: 80-120 |
5 with offsets |
|
5 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
23 |
17 |
3 |
7 |
13 |
City of San Jose (Safety) |
|
|
6.75% |
3.25% |
3.50% |
most G/L 15 layered |
Y: 80-120 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
Contra Costa County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.25% |
3.75% |
5 - declining; G/L 18 layered |
N |
5 |
|
7 |
7 |
16 |
12 |
12 |
31 |
29 |
33 |
34 |
40 |
City of San Jose (General) |
|
|
6.75% |
3.25% |
3.50% |
most 21 - declining; G/L layered 20 |
N |
5 |
|
8 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
7 |
LA Department of Water & Power |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
1-declining; G/L 15 - layered Level $$ |
N |
5 |
|
9 |
19 |
18 |
17 |
22 |
22 |
31 |
30 |
29 |
30 |
San Diego County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.25% |
3.75% |
6-declining; G/L 20 layered |
N |
5 |
|
10 |
11 |
10 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
13 |
11 |
Sonoma County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.25% |
3.75% |
10-declining; G/L 20 layered |
N |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
9 |
8 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
22 |
20 |
22 |
24 |
Fresno County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.25% |
3.75% |
15-declining; G/L 15 layered |
Y: 70-130 |
5 |
|
12 |
10 |
9 |
20 |
20 |
16 |
18 |
18 |
30 |
31 |
Santa Barbara County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% |
most 12-declining; G/L 19 layered and ramped |
N/A(market) |
N/A |
|
13 |
12 |
31 |
30 |
28 |
29 |
25 |
25 |
24 |
29 |
Sacramento County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.25% |
3.75% |
Most 17 - declining; G/L 20 layered |
Y: 70-130 |
7 |
|
14 |
13 |
11 |
15 |
15 |
13 |
33 |
32 |
31 |
32 |
City of Fresno (Safety) 10 |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
G/L 15-layered (100+% FR) |
N |
5 |
|
15 |
14 |
12 |
16 |
16 |
14 |
34 |
31 |
32 |
33 |
City of Fresno (General) 6 10 |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
G/L 15 layered (100+% FR) |
N |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
15 |
29 |
29 |
30 |
32 |
30 |
36 |
27 |
8 |
Mendocino County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.50% |
3.50% |
21-declining; G/L 18 layered |
Y: 75-125 |
5 |
|
17 |
16 |
19 |
18 |
17 |
17 |
12 |
34 |
33 |
35 |
Orange County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.25% |
3.75% |
15-declining; G/L 20 layered |
N |
5 |
|
18 |
17 |
21 |
24 |
19 |
15 |
9 |
21 |
21 |
14 |
Marin County 4 |
|
|
7.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% |
12-declining; G/L 24 layered and ramped |
N/A (Market) |
N/A |
|
19 |
18 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
12 |
12 |
16 |
San Bernardino County |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
4-declining; G/L layered 20 |
N |
5 |
|
20 |
20 |
24 |
23 |
21 |
25 |
16 |
17 |
16 |
19 |
Los Angeles Fire & Police |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
most G/L 20 layered; 7.7 years = avg. remaining period |
Y: 60-140 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
21 |
20 |
19 |
18 |
18 |
23 |
22 |
15 |
17 |
Imperial County |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
13 - declining; G/L 15 layered |
Y: 70-130 |
5 |
|
22 |
25 |
14 |
9 |
9 |
7 |
11 |
13 |
10 |
12 |
Ventura County |
|
|
7.25% |
3.25% |
4.00% |
1-declining; G/L 15 - layered |
N |
5 |
|
23 |
22 |
28 |
28 |
27 |
28 |
24 |
23 |
17 |
20 |
Alameda County |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
14 - declining ; G/L 20 layered |
Y: 60-140 |
5 |
|
24 |
23 |
27 |
25 |
24 |
26 |
20 |
24 |
23 |
25 |
Kern County |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
17.5 - declining; G/L 18 layered |
Y: 50-150 |
5 |
|
25 |
26 |
22 |
22 |
36 |
36 |
37 |
39 |
39 |
38 |
Stanislaus County |
|
|
7.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% |
18 - declining |
Y: 80-120 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
24 |
13 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
8 |
11 |
37 |
36 |
Alameda-Contra Costa Transit 4 |
|
|
7.125% |
3.00% |
4.125% |
10-declining; G/L 20 layered |
Y: 80-120 |
5 |
|
27 |
27 |
25 |
27 |
25 |
27 |
21 |
35 |
35 |
28 |
San Luis Obispo County 8 |
|
|
7.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% |
22- declining |
N |
5 |
|
28 |
28 |
17 |
13 |
13 |
11 |
10 |
8 |
3 |
3 |
City & County of San Francisco |
|
|
7.40% |
3.50% |
3.90% |
most 15-declining; G/L 20 layered |
N |
5 |
|
29 |
29 |
23 |
31 |
31 |
21 |
15 |
16 |
14 |
9 |
Merced County |
|
|
7.25% |
2.75% |
4.50% |
11- declining;G/L 24 layered and ramped |
N/A(market) |
N/A |
|
30 |
30 |
30 |
21 |
26 |
20 |
14 |
15 |
6 |
6 |
University of California 9 |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
22-declining, G/L 20 layered Level $$ |
N |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
31 |
33 |
32 |
32 |
30 |
26 |
26 |
20 |
22 |
City of Los Angeles |
|
|
7.25% |
3.50% |
3.75% |
most 24-declining ; G/L 15-layered |
Y: 60-140 |
most 7 |
|
32 |
32 |
37 |
37 |
29 |
24 |
19 |
19 |
19 |
21 |
Tulare County |
|
|
7.25% |
3.00% |
4.25% |
16-declining; G/L 19 layered |
Y: 70-130 |
10 |
|
33 |
34 |
32 |
34 |
34 |
35 |
36 |
40 |
40 |
39 |
East Bay Municipal Utility |
|
|
7.00% |
3.25% |
3.75% |
Pre-2012 layered 30; Otherwise G/L-20 layered |
Y: 70-130 |
5 |
|
34 |
33 |
36 |
36 |
37 |
37 |
35 |
29 |
28 |
26 |
CalSTRS |
|
|
7.00% |
3.50% |
3.50% |
28 years with laddered increases |
N |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
37 |
26 |
26 |
23 |
19 |
28 |
28 |
25 |
23 |
San Joaquin County 7 |
|
|
7.25% |
3.15% |
4.10% |
15-declining; G/L 15 layered |
Y: 80-120 |
5 |
|
36 |
35 |
34 |
33 |
33 |
33 |
32 |
37 |
38 |
37 |
CalPERS 3 |
|
|
7.25% |
2.875% |
4.375% |
18-declining ; G/L 30 layered with ramping |
N/A(market) |
N/A |
37 |
36 |
35 |
35 |
35 |
34 |
27 |
27 |
26 |
27 |
Los Angeles County |
|
|
7.25% |
3.25% |
4.00% |
21- declining; G/L 30 layered |
N |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES: |
|
|
|
|
|
Bold indicates change from previous survey. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: This does not reflect the Judges I system closed in 1994: features include pay-as-you-go funding and a 3% assumed investment return |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2: Legal agreement determines contribution level -- pegged to specified funded ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3: 2018 assumed investment return will be lowered to 7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4: 50% of "extraordinary" 2008/09 losses amortized over 30 years; 2019 assumed investment return will be lowered to 7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5: System is now closed for non-Police but subject to ongoing litigation and court challenges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6: Amortization will revert to average future working lifetime, roughly 10 years, in event FR becomes < 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7: Extraordinary 2008 actuarial loss amortized over 30 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8: 2008 actuarial losses amortized over 10 years but with some accelerated funding; Base wage inflation will decrease to 2.75% in 2019 valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9:
Post-7/1/16 hires have option to elect to be in defined contribution ("DC")
plan; to date, 35% have elected DC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% contribution will be made toward UAL for those in DC plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional state contributions may be required as 14% employer rate and 8% employee rate are below actuarial funding policy rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10: If FR (funded ratio) >110%, 30-year amortization of surplus (just lengthened from 25 years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survey and related text will be posted on roederfinancial.com We can be contacted at (619) 300-8500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FR = Funded ratio |
|
G/L = actuarial gains/actuarial losses |
|
"Layered" means a new amotization base is created each year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POB = Pension Obligation Bond |
|
|
|
DC = Defined Contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective with the 2013 survey, the number of entities was reduced from 40 to 37, eliminating three small closed systems. |
|
|
|
|
|
The amortization periods for assumption changes a
re often longer than for G/L and are not shown here. Often, there is a separate amortization
policy applicable to benefit changes. |